How To Quickly Estimate Your Indirect, Uninsured Workers Compensation Costs

 

If you are like most businesses today you are being constantly pressured by customers to reduce prices and improve quality. At the same time you must constantly fend off vendors and suppliers who are attempting to pass along their price increases to you. In this environment you probably spend a tremendous amount of time and financial resources improving productivity and reducing waste throughout your organization. You know all too well that this waste and inefficiency represents a significant threat to your competitive edge, growth plans, and bottom line profit.

Have you considered the fact that every worker injury is a major disruption to your work process and creates waste and inefficiency throughout your organization? According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), for every $1 you spend on medical expenses for a workers compensation claim you also incur $4 in indirect workers compensation costs. Also, for every $1 of disability (lost time) expenses paid for a workers compensation claim OSHA estimates that you also incur between $2 and $10 in indirect workers compensation costs.

 

When corporate executives were surveyed in January, 2005 by a major insurance company, two out of every three estimated their company’s average ratio of indirect workers compensation costs to direct costs (premiums) for a worker injury claim to be at least 2:1. Unfortunately indirect workers compensation costs are rarely taken into account by most business owners and financial mangers because they are not easily identified. The difficulty is in accurately measuring this financial impact, and obtaining reliable information on which business owners and financial managers can deploy scare resources to minimize these costs. However, designing a safety program around the credible quantification of your organization’s TOTAL COST of worker injuries is the more effective way of reducing short-term and long-term costs. Also, if injuries do still occur, organizations are finding that aggressive workers compensation claim management practices that include a prompt injury response and return to work programs can significantly reduce the financial waste resulting from workers compensation claims.

Now you can quickly estimate your TOTAL COST of workers compensation injuries using OSHA’s industry estimates. To access our FREE, on-line total cost estimator go to www.comperaser.com today. It takes only a couple minutes and the results will surprise you.

 

CompEraser is the only service in the marketplace that will calculate your TOTAL COST of worker injuries using your own financial data. Therefore, while our TOTAL COST estimator is an excellent guide, our service takes the quantification of worker injury costs to a far greater level. CompEraser also comes with on-line, on-demand resources needed to reduce your TOTAL of worker injuries. These resources include the formalization of your safety team, injury prevention, OSHA compliance, safety training, prompt injury response, workers compensation disability management, plus more. These resources are available 24/7 and used irrespective of which workers compensation carrier you select. Its patent-pending technology also provides unique financial reports for monitoring the effectiveness of your safety and health program on an on-going basis. For more information visit our website at www.CompEraser.com.

 


Now You Can Benchmark Your Safety Training Program To Reduce Workers Compensation Costs

 

There are a number of reasons why designing and implementing an effective, on-going safety training program is important. These include:

 

  1. Safety training is required by law. Having on-going safety training is required by OSHA and similar state authorities. Training is one of the most important elements in an OSHA compliance program. Providing workers with complete information as to the processes they are involved in, the equipment they might need to use, the protection available, and potential effects of exposure to hazards is extremely important to OSHA.  The organization may also be subject to fines by OSHA inspectors for failing to comply with these OSHA standards. 
     
  2. Safety training improves safety awareness. Studies have consistently revealed that effective safety training can dramatically increase the level of employee awareness and interest in workplace safety. For example, in one study it was found that 97% of respondents positively indicated marked improvement in safety awareness in those organizations that had on-going safety programs.

  1. Safety training improves employee attitudes towards safety. Surveys have also revealed that 95% of organizations notice significant increases in employee attitude towards safety once an on-going safety training program was initiated.

  1. Safety training influences reductions in accidents. While it is often difficult to put an exact figure on the impact that training has on accident reduction, studies have shown that organizations with an on-going safety training program are four times more likely to reduce accidents than those who do not have an on-going training program.

It is clear that safety training, in conjunction with other safety efforts, can dramatically reduce workers compensation costs. And, when you take in to account the indirect workers compensation costs the return on investment is even more dramatic.

 

You can now benchmark the effectiveness of your safety training program using CompEraser’s Safety And Health Benchmark Survey. If you agree that the critical first step in making quantum improvements in your safety and health program, and reducing your total worker injury costs, is to evaluate what you have in place and measure its effectiveness then this FREE, no obligation, on-line safety assessment is for you. Nowhere else can you get such a fast, easy to use elf-evaluation that will immediately analyze the twelve major components that drive your worker injury costs, including the formalization of your safety team.

 

CompEraser’s amazing on-line safety and health self-evaluation comes with no strings attached. There are no sales pitches, no “bait-and-switch” tactics, no cookies, and no irritating pop-ups. Just an honest, independent assessment of your safety program that will provide unique insights into how you can significantly reduce your worker injury costs.  Plus, you complete this survey in the privacy of your office or home, on-line 24/7. No two reports are alike. You are measured strictly on your own responses. All responses are 100% confidential—GUARANTEED. Come back as often as you like at no cost or obligation (many companies do). CompEraser will immediately produce on-line (that’s right...no waiting) detailed reports that benchmark your safety and health program against industry Best Practices. Then, based upon your responses CompEraser will also provide safety tips to help you improve your problem areas.

 

To access our FREE, on-line safety and health benchmark survey, go to www.comperaser.com today. There you can evaluate your entire safety program or just select the Safety Training category.

 

CompEraser also comes with on-line, on-demand resources needed to develop and implement an effective safety and health program. These resources include the formalization of your safety team, injury prevention, OSHA compliance, safety training, prompt injury response, workers compensation disability management, plus more. These resources are available 24/7 and used irrespective of which workers compensation carrier you select. Its patent-pending technology also provides unique financial reports for monitoring the effectiveness of your safety and health program on an on-going basis. For more information visit our website at www.CompEraser.com.


Do You Know What Your Workers Compensation Claims Really Cost You? Find Out For FREE At www.CompEraser.com Today

 

Industry statistics consistently indicate that only 25 – 40% of the total cost of workers compensation claims is transferable to your insurance carrier. The remaining cost still hits your bottom line - and hits it hard – but is completely uninsured. These “uninsured costs” are the result of the marginal inefficiencies to your manufacturing or service process as a result of a work-related injury.

 

There have been past studies that have attempted to measure uninsured costs. Unfortunately, these studies are quite old and are general in nature. As an example, Terrance Miller, in his article “Track The True Cost of Accidents, Safety & Health, November, 1991:

 

“Uninsured costs are usually calculated from insured costs using a ratio. Fixed, arbitrary ratios such as 1-to-1, 4-to-1 or even 10-to-1 are sometimes used. However, uninsured costs vary so much from one operation to another, the only appropriate ration is one developed for your plant or company.”

 

The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) also refers to these studies on their website, stating:

 

“Studies show that the ratio of indirect costs to direct costs varies widely, from a 20:1 to a low of 1:1.”

 

CompEraser’s own analysis of customer claims reveals that for every $100 if insured workers compensation claims the indirect workers compensation costs are $380. Unfortunately uninsured costs are rarely taken into account by most business owners and financial mangers because they are not easily identified. The difficulty is in accurately measuring this financial impact, and obtaining reliable information on which business owners and financial managers can deploy scare resources to minimize these costs. However, designing safety and health practices around the credible quantification of your organization’s TOTAL COST of worker injuries is the more effective way of reducing short-term and long-term costs.

 

Now you can estimate your TOTAL COST of worker injuries using OSHA estimates in the privacy of your office. It is on-line and available 24-7. To find out more go to www.comperaser.com. These resources also include injury prevention, OSHA compliance, safety training, prompt injury response, workers compensation disability management, plus more. These resources are available 24/7 and used irrespective of which workers compensation carrier you select. Its patent-pending technology also provides unique financial reports for monitoring the effectiveness of your safety and health program on an on-going basis. For more information visit our website at www.CompEraser.com.


 

Proof Positive That A Positive Safety Culture Will Dramatically Reduce Your Workers Compensation Costs

In previous blogs I mentioned the importance of implementing what we at CompEraser call “the 5-C’s:” COMMUNICATION, COMPASSION, CONSISTENCY, COMPLIANCE and CONTROL. When take as a whole the 5-C’s will instill an incredibly strong safety culture throughout your organization. Intuitively, it just makes sense that a culture conducive to health and safety would translate into better health and safety performance and workers compensation cost reduction.

 

Extensive new research from the consulting firm, Towers Perrin-ISR, has demonstrated new insights on the link between culture and performance. Specifically, their researchers zeroed in on four aspects of culture that influence outcomes: supervision, employee empowerment, teamwork, and workload. This study involved employee opinion data collected from more than 58,000 employees at 37 separate sites and compared with actual safety data gathered from the same 37 sites. Here is what they found.

 

Accident-related workday interruptions were higher at sites where respondents perceived higher workloads. In addition, employee perceptions of teamwork were also found to be related to this safety measure. Further, employee ratings of teamwork were actually found to moderate the impact of perceived workload on accident-related interruptions to the workday;

 

Under conditions of below average teamwork, greater workload was associated with a 62% higher rate of safety incidents. Under conditions of above average teamwork, even high workload sites experienced only moderate rates of safety incidents, suggesting that greater teamwork buffered the impact of high workload;

 

The study revealed a negative relationship between incidences of accident-related absences from work and employee empowerment. In general, the incidence of accident-related absence was almost 74% lower at sites where workers reported higher levels of empowerment;

 

The Towers Perrin-ISR analysis revealed a number of cultural factors that significantly correlated with documented rates of work-related injuries. Specifically, locations where employees were significantly more favorable about leadership (+7), teamwork (+7), customer focus (+4), quality (+4), job satisfaction (+7), supervision (+3), operating efficiency (+4), empowerment (+4) and innovation (+4) were also locations with less frequent work-related injuries.

 

In summary, sites with the greatest improvements in employee favorability on supervision, teamwork, empowerment, workload, senior management and employee well-being, had the greatest declines in safety incidents. The sites that made the cultural investment in the key areas coming out of the study experienced the greatest safety return on this investment.

 

CompEraser comes with on-line, on-demand resources needed to successfully implement the “5-C’s” throughout your organization and, as a result, dramatically reduce both insured and indirect workers compensation costs. Resources also include the formalization of your safety team, injury prevention, OSHA compliance, safety training, prompt injury response, workers compensation disability management, plus more. These resources are available 24/7 and used irrespective of which workers compensation carrier you select. Its patent-pending technology also provides unique financial reports for monitoring the effectiveness of your safety and health program on an on-going basis. For more information visit our website at www.CompEraser.com

 


It Has Been Difficult To Accurately Measure Indirect Workers Compensation Costs – Until Now

 

It has been my experience that accountants and financial managers are extremely effective at measuring the various components that go into the manufacture of a product or delivery of a service, particularly when it comes to measuring “added value” at each stage of a manufacturing process, or service delivery. This effort is focused primarily on the quantification of various components of productivity (P) that ultimately generates an operating profit. Unfortunately, traditional cost accounting struggles with the measurement of what I call a company’s Resource Quality (RQ) and has even more difficulty measuring the dynamic trade-offers and interrelationships associated with balancing a company’s P and RQ.

 

As a result, they use worker compensation premium and their experience modification as the way to measure the cost of worker injuries in the workplace. Workers compensation premium is clearly an easy measuring device. This premium is a function of your company’s audited payrolls, insurance rates by classification code, the workers compensation experience modification, and the competitive nature of the workers compensation insurance marketplace. In reality it is based upon expected losses that that the insurance company expects to pay over the course of the policy term. The fallacy is that your workers compensation premium only addresses the insured cost of workers compensation injuries and fails to accurately measure your indirect workers compensation costs. Never forget that workers compensation premiums account for approximately 1/3 of your total workers compensation costs.

 

Your workers compensation experience modification is a method used to recognize past loss experience when calculating your insurance premium. Your “experience mod,” as it is commonly called, is actually a statistical formula that compares your historical loss experience to your industry peer group.  If your “experience mod” develops a 20% credit (indicated by a .80 experience modification), then you will pay 80% of the manual premium. On the other hand, if you have a 20% debit (indicated by a 1.20 experience modification) you will pay a surcharge of 20% above the manual premium. Your experience modification is calculated by using three (3) years of loss experience, with the current year not counted in the calculation. It is very important that you understand that an individual workers compensation claim will be included in the calculation of your workers compensation experience modification for 3 years, and can be quite costly. There is no question that the workers compensation experience modification is an important component in calculating your insurance premium, and does provide an excellent benchmark to roughly compare your safety performance against your industry peer group. However, the factors that go into its calculation are still only insured costs.  As such, it also fails to address indirect workers compensation costs and, as a result, the total cost of worker injuries. So, let me ask you the following question:

 

Are You Comfortable Making Financial Decisions Based On Only 1/3 Of Facts?

 

In talking to business owners and financial managers throughout the United States in virtually every industry section their answer is a resounding “NO.” They know intuitively that there are other costs associated with a workers compensation claim but have struggled to credibility calculate these indirect, uninsured costs. The good news is that they now can – using CompEraser’s patent-pending technology. It is the only resource in the marketplace that calculates your total cost of workers compensation claims using your own financial data – not industry estimates. So you will now be able to quantify all your operating costs stemming from a workers compensation claim and make more informed decision.

 

CompEraser comes with on-line, on-demand resources needed to develop and implement an effective safety and health program. These resources include injury prevention, OSHA compliance, safety training, prompt injury response, workers compensation disability management, plus more. These resources are available 24/7 and used irrespective of which workers compensation carrier you select. Its patent-pending technology also provides unique financial reports for monitoring the effectiveness of your safety and health program on an on-going basis. For more information visit our website at www.CompEraser.com.


Six (6) Mistakes Employers Make In Implementing Their Workers Compensation Disability Management Program

 

Return to work programs, also called temporary duty, are an integral part of workers compensation disability management. Even though employers may have, on paper, a temporary duty program, they often have difficulties implementing it. The bottom line results are that employee stays off work longer than necessary and workers compensation costs soar. While I am retained to analyze why, and help correct the problem, here are the six most common mistakes I find:

  • Failure to quickly identify potential accommodation opportunities based upon work capacity. It all starts with prompt injury response and getting within 48-hours a written evaluation of work capacity from the treating physician. Without this report all else fails. Once the work capacity report is received employers also take too long in identifying temporary duty accommodations. Time is money. The longer it takes the longer the employee stays off work, loses the “working habit,” and falls within the orbit of the healthcare system.

  • Failure to get written medical approval of temporary jobs/tasks to be offered to the injured employee. This one is huge. It is not enough to find the temporary duty tasks. You absolutely must get written approval from the treating physician BEFORE the job is offered. Otherwise is not an ADA-compliant accommodation. Several things may happen as a result and all of them are bad. First, the employer loses legal leverage to get the employee back to work. Second, if the injured employee doctor shops they have the legal leverage. Third, if the injured employee has an attorney they definitely have the leverage. Finally, the injured employee may be offered a job that is not right for their situation and aggravates the injury.

  • Failure to make the return to work offer in writing. It is not enough to call the employee up and offer the accommodation verbally. It must be a formal written offer. I also find that the employer has not kept this written record in the claim file. This significantly weakens their position before the state workers compensation commission. Again the result is the injured employee stays off work and costs soar.

  • Failure to get a written medical release from the treating physician. Once the temporary duty offer has been accepted I find that employers do not get a written release from the treating physician. This also is a critical piece of documentation needed to remain ADA-compliant and strengthen the employer position before the state workers compensation commission.

  • Failure to up-date the Leave of Absence Policy to include rejected return to work offers. Far too often I find employers who fight the temporary duty problems in the context of workers compensation law. By integrating the temporary duty policy in with a strong Leave of Absence Policy the employer can now take employment related action with consistent with company HR policy. Many employers who use this technique can not only discontinue workers compensation disability benefit where permitted by state law. They can now take other punitive measures consistent with overall company policy.

  • Failure to integrate RTW with FMLA, ADA, and HIPPA. Navigating through the legal minefield created by workers compensation law, the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the American with Disabilities Act (AD), and the Health Insurance Portability and Privacy Act (HIPPA) is extremely complex. However, if implemented in a consistent manner in full compliance with these laws the employer actually will find that their legal position is greatly enhanced.

CompEraser provides a number of additional on-line resources to help your organization formalize, implement and monitor its Temporary Duty Program in full compliance with state and federal laws. All of these common mistakes are address in an easy to use, turnkey workers compensation disability management program. Also the program is constantly benchmarked and monitored to give you immediate insight into how to take corrective action and reduce both insured and indirect workers compensation costs. Please visit our website at www.CompEraser.com.


 

Legally Permitted Pre-Employment Drug Testing Reduces Workers Compensation Costs

 

Being injured on the job under the influence of drugs is one of the most critical problems facing employers today. The United States Department of Health and Human Services indicated in their study “National Household Survey On Drug Abuse” that nearly 70% of those Americans who engage in illicit drug use are employed. To bring the point home, in its survey of those employees seeking help from a telephone call in service, the “National Cocaine Hotline” revealed:

 

  • 75% of those that called in said they had used illegal drugs on the job;
  • 64% admitted that drug use had adversely affected their job performance;
  • 44% said they had sold illegal drugs to other employees;
  • 18% said they had stolen from fellow employees to support their drug habit.

Also, the U.S. government, in a National Institute of Drug Abuse publication, reported the results of a study finding that those who illicitly use drugs are:

 

  • 2.2 times more likely to request early dismissal or time off;
  • 2.5 times more likely to have absences of eight days or more;
  • 3.6 times more likely to injury themselves or another person in a workplace accident; and
  • 5 times more likely to file a workers compensation claim.

Other studies have shown that drug users who are employed are one-third less productive and incur 300% higher medical costs. Clearly, employees who use illegal drugs in the workplace are a hazard not only to themselves but to the safety of fellow employees.

 

By far the most common type of drug testing in the workplace is the testing of job applicants. There are several reasons for this, including:

  • Pre-employment drug testing is the least controversial. Job applicant testing is the type of drug testing that is least likely to cause morale problems in the workplace.

  • Pre-employment drug testing is cost effective. Employers can more effectively screen out potential drug problems before they become their drug problems and can channel their limited resources into employee assistance and rehabilitation programs for those employees who develop or already have drug problems.

  • Pre-employment drug testing is the legally safest type of drug testing available to employers. There are no issues of performance, severance pay, benefits, seniority, or pensions. Also, the ADA excludes from the definition of disability the current illegal use of drugs.

  • The mere existence of a drug testing program has self-screening effects. Generally when an organization announces that it has a drug testing program three things happen – it gets fewer job applications, some applicants want away from the application process when they realize they will be tested for drugs, and applicants who are called back in the post-offer stage decline to do so when they realize there will be a drug test. All three results are good because the organization is better off without these applicants as employees.

The bottom line is that pre-employment drug testing, when implement in accordance with state and federal law, is extremely cost effective. It also reduces both insured workers compensation costs and indirect workers compensation costs. The productivity of your organization will be greatly enhanced as well.

 

CompEraser provides two important resources to help your organization implement an effective drug testing program. First, its Resource Library provides all the tools, forms and other resources needed to design the program in accordance with state and federal law. Second, through a national joint venture partner it provides all the drug testing resources you need at discount prices. For more information go to www.comperaser.com.

 

 


Accelerate Workers Compensation Cost Reduction By Integrating Safety Into Quality Control Meetings

 

While using a standard “Safety Suggestion Form” may be used effectively to get feedback from employees and identify unsafe hazards, a potential drawback to this approach is that it requires the employee, through his or her own initiative, to complete it. It also requires a separate response process by the safety and health team. There is another way to get safety suggestions and, at the same time, put safety awareness on overdrive throughout your organization. Have you considered taking your Safety Suggestion Program into the inner workings of your quality control or productivity meetings? The diagram below shows how this process can work:


safety_qc_process
 

During the course of your quality control or productivity meeting the participating employees will discuss on-going production or service issues of all kinds, including safety hazards. The team leader will ask for and encourage comments of all kinds. It does not matter what the suggestion is. It could be minor or major. The key is to encourage employee safety suggestions that will improve their productivity. The only requirement is that the team work together to clearly identify the problem and work together to develop a recommended solution for management’s consideration. This process should also be “risk free.” Once completed the quality control team will submit its recommendations to management for review and action. Management will then review the recommendation, makes its decision on a course of action, and assigns the task to someone to complete in a timely manner. That individual will then develop a budget and implement the action. It is critical that management notify the quality control team within five business days of its decision and also will notify them once the recommendation has been fully implemented. Otherwise the employees will quickly realize that this is just a “management fad” and “they are only interested in production.” By responding promptly management is clearly expressing genuine interest and concern for their safety and backing it up with action.

 

The benefits of this approach to your organization are:


  • It incorporates all the key components of an effective safety suggestion program;
  • It literally uses the dialog and synergy created in quality control and productivity meetings as the engine for safety success;
  • It encourages suggestions that apply to worker safety and quality control/productivity. As such it is a far more inclusive;
  • If utilized properly this approach will literally tap into valuable recommendations that many employees have and, as a result, make the organization more cost effective;
  • It will help your organization in its OSHA compliance efforts and facilitate safety training;
  • Because the process links safety with productivity and quality control it will dramatically reduce your indirect workers compensation costs.

CompEraser provides a number of on-line, on-demand resources to help you quickly implement this process. If you would like a sample of three-part form that is used in this process please contact us at info@comperaser.com. For more information on CompEraser’s services please go to www.comperaser.com.


Do You Have A Safety And Health Plan?

 

Preventing workplace injuries should be just as important to your organization as the quality of its products or services. Ultimately your ability to accomplish your business plans depends, in part, on the health and welfare of those who contribute to it. It stands to reason that if the organization is sincerely committed to product or service quality it also will be equally committed to worker safety. They go hand-in-hand.

 

As with other major initiatives undertaken, such a serious commitment deserves serious and thorough planning in order to accomplish the ultimate goal of maintaining “zero injuries” and reducing workers compensation costs. Otherwise your organization’s collective safety and health efforts will fall short of expectations and will waste valuable time and resources. To make matters worse, employees will view the organization’s efforts as “just another management fad,” and the overall effort will not be taken seriously.

 

If properly developed the annual safety and health plan will provide the following benefits to your organization in its effort to minimize work-related injuries:

 

  1. Top Management Commitment Is Obtained. This planning document should receive top management support. Once approved, the safety and health team will have complete assurance that management fully supports their efforts and that sufficient resources are being allocated to accomplish stated goals.

 

  1. All Team Members Are On The Same Page. Everyone on the safety and health team will be aware of their responsibilities and organizational goals. As a result, collective efforts will be focused in the same direction.

 

  1. The Safety And Health Team Is Empowered. Once approved by top management, all members of the safety and health team will be empowered to execute the annual injury prevention plan and will be accountable for its proper implementation.

 

  1. Results Are Monitored And Measured. A key benefit of the annual injury prevention plan is that specific goals are prepared in measurable ways. Therefore, the safety and health team will know if its collective efforts were executed successfully or if additional focus is needed in certain areas.

 

  1. Valuable Feedback Is Provided For Further Planning And Implementation. Because the injury prevention plan is monitored on an on-going basis, the Safety Director will be supplied with reliable information to help in understanding which efforts are working and what needs further improvement or focus.

 

In short, the annual safety and health plan is the road map to accomplishing your organization’s safety and health goals with the full support of upper management.  Taking this step seriously will pay huge dividends down the road but reducing both insured workers compensation costs as well as indirect workers compensation costs.

 

CompEraser comes with on-line, on-demand resources needed to develop and implement an effective safety and health plan. Its patent-pending technology also provides unique financial reports for monitoring the effectiveness of your safety and health plan on an on-going basis. For more information visit our website at www.CompEraser.com.

 

 


Investigating Near Misses Is Key To Workers Compensation Cost Reduction

 

A near miss is an unplanned event that did not result in injury, illness, or damage but had the potential to do so. Only a fortunate break in the chain of events prevented an injury, fatality or damage from occurring. Although unsafe acts or behavior are usually the initiating event, a faulty process or system invariably permits or compounds the harm, and is the focus of improvement. Other familiar terms for these events is a "close call", or in the case of moving objects, "near collision".

 

Employees often comment after an employee is actually injured on the job that they had also experience a “close call” themselves involving the exact chain of events. In fact, in many organizations the ratio of “near misses” to actual employee injuries is 15:1. Therefore, it only stands to reason that if the organization can understand and reduce its frequency of “near misses” the frequency of workers injuries should drop dramatically as well.

 

Understanding and analyzing “near misses” is all about determining the “root cause” of the incident and taking the appropriate measure to reduce its frequency of happening again. Unlike worker injury claim analysis, which has a severity component, “near miss” analysis is all about incident frequency. Because it is a valuable indicator of potential injuries to come, it is an excellent technique for reducing insured workers compensation costs as well as indirect workers compensation costs. It is also highly recommended by OSHA.

 

In addition, a key to a successful “near miss” investigation program is actually getting the event reported in the first place. It is all about winning the hearts and minds of the employees which, in turn, requires that the organization convince its employees that it is sincerely committed to preventing work-related injuries.

 

The CompEraser system is loaded with all the tools, forms and checklists you must have to identify and analyze your workers compensation near misses. For more information go to www.comperaser.com.


If You Think The Insured Cost Of A Workers Compensation Claim Is High, Read This

 

If you are like most businesses today, you are being constantly pressured by customers to reduce prices and improve quality. At the same time you must constantly fend off vendors and suppliers who are attempting to pass along their price increases to you. In this environment you probably spend a tremendous amount of time and financial resources improving productivity and reducing waste throughout your organization. You know all too well that this waste and inefficiency represents a significant threat to your competitive edge, growth plans, and bottom line profit.

Have you considered the fact that every worker injury is a major disruption to your work process and creates waste and inefficiency throughout your organization? According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), for every $1 you spend on medical expenses for a workers compensation claim you also incur $4 in indirect workers compensation costs. Also, for every $1 of disability (lost time) expenses paid for a workers compensation claim OSHA estimates that you also incur between $2 and $10 in indirect workers compensation costs.

 

When corporate executives were surveyed in January, 2005 by a major insurance company, two out of every three estimated their company’s average ratio of indirect workers compensation costs to direct costs (premiums) for a worker injury claim to be at least 2:1. Unfortunately indirect workers compensation costs are rarely taken into account by most business owners and financial mangers because they are not easily identified. The difficulty is in accurately measuring this financial impact, and obtaining reliable information on which business owners and financial managers can deploy scare resources to minimize these costs. However, designing a safety program around the credible quantification of your organization’s TOTAL COST of worker injuries is the more effective way of reducing short-term and long-term costs. Also, if injuries do still occur, organizations are finding that aggressive workers compensation claim management practices that include a prompt injury response and return to work programs can significantly reduce the financial waste resulting from workers compensation claims.

Now you can quantify your TOTAL COST of workers compensation injuries, zero in on your areas of financial waste in your organization using revolutionary new technology – CompEraser. For more information go to www.comperaser.com. 

 


Four Reasons Why Safety Training Will Reduce Workers Compensation Costs

 

There are a number of reasons why designing and implementing an effective, on-going safety training program is important. These include:

 

  1. Safety training is required by law. Having on-going safety training is required by OSHA and similar state authorities. Training is one of the most important elements in an OSHA compliance program. Providing workers with complete information as to the processes they are involved in, the equipment they might need to use, the protection available, and potential effects of exposure to hazards is extremely important to OSHA.  The organization may also be subject to fines by OSHA inspectors for failing to comply with these OSHA standards.

 

  1. Safety training improves safety awareness. Studies have consistently revealed that effective safety training can dramatically increase the level of employee awareness and interest in workplace safety. For example, in one study it was found that 97% of respondents positively indicated marked improvement in safety awareness in those organizations that had on-going safety programs.

 

  1. Safety training improves employee attitudes towards safety. Surveys have also revealed that 95% of organizations notice significant increases in employee attitude towards safety once an on-going safety training program was initiated.

 

  1. Safety training influences reductions in accidents. While it is often difficult to put an exact figure on the impact that training has on accident reduction, studies have shown that organizations with an on-going safety training program are four times more likely to reduce accidents than those who do not have an on-going training program.

 

It is clear that safety training, in conjunction with other safety efforts, can dramatically reduce workers compensation costs. And, when you take in to account the indirect workers compensation costs the return on investment is even more dramatic.

 

The Resource Library within the CompEraser system is loaded with all the tools, forms and checklists you must have to design and implement a successful safety training program. For more information go to www.comperaser.com.

 

 


Integrating Your Temporary Duty Policy In With Your Leave Of Absence Policy Will Dramatically Reduce Workers Compensation Premiums And Indirect Workers Compensation Costs

 

There are at least two critical policy statements that directly impact the sucessful implementation of your organization's workers compensation disability management strategy:

 

  • Your Leave Of Absence Policy, and
  • Your Temporary Duty Policy.

 

Many organizations fail to recognize that these two policies are actually interrelated. The reason is very simple: An employee’s refusal to accept a bona fide temporary duty offer and not come back to work can be considered an unexcused leave of absence. By implementing these policies consistently and in accordance with state and federal laws they give your organization a significant degree of leverage over employees who chose not to comply with the organization’s claim management procedures, particularly those that apply to work-related disabilities.  This strategy will directly affect the cost of the disability injury, minimize workers compensation cost, and significantly curtail lost productivity.
 

The Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the American With Disabilities Act (ADA), and state employment laws require employers to provide leave for workers under certain conditions but give employers some discretion over how to administer that leave. Establishing or modifying leave policies that are consistent with state and federal laws and implemented uniformly can help play a large role in defining which employees may take leave, as well as how and when they can take it. It is essential that your organization have leave of absence policies and procedures that coordinate its lost-time claims with the FMLA, ADA and other state disability laws.


Guidelines For Establishing An Effective Leave Of Absence Policy


Establishing a Leave of Absence Policy serves many purposes. From a philosophical standpoint, a Leave of Absence Policy serves the same aim as other personal policies and practices – to give employees a good working environment while at the same time ensuring that the employer’s productivity and financial standards are maintained. From a practical standpoint a Leave of Absence Policy clarifies employer and employee rights and responsibilities regarding leave, rationalizes leave decisions by explaining why certain decisions are made so that they do not appear arbitrary, and provides a standard operating procedure all managers can use to make those decisions. Also, if no Leave of Absence Policy exists then past practices may be interpreted as policy.

 

Employers should keep in mind the “big picture” when formulating or revising their leave of absence policies, and consider the following general principles:’

 

  • The employer must provide notice of its leave of absence policies as required by the FMLA and state leave laws;
  • Leave of absence policies should be applied consistently to all similarly situated employees and reviewed by legal counsel;
  • Leaves may be granted without pay, although employees may use any accrued paid time off during a leave to offset the lack of compensation;
  • Benefits may be continued during a leave of absence and, in some instances, federal and state law require continuation of benefits during the leave; and
  • Employees usually are entitled to reinstatement of their positions on return from an approved leave.

 

Second, clear communication is a critical objective of a Leave of Absence Policy. Compliant organizations communicate their practices and procedures to the managers who are expected to implement them. They also communicate the same to employees who are covered by them. Effective communication ensures that all parties know:

 

  • What leave is available, and for what reasons;
  • How much leave is available;
  • Who is entitled to leave;
  • How the employee is expected to request leave (i.e., how much notice is needed, who must be told, what medical certification is necessary, etc.);
  • How the employer will respond to leave requests;
  • What to expect during and after the leave (i.e., continuation of benefits, restoration rights, etc.); and
  • The consequences of not satisfying the organization’s leave of absence policy.

 

Third, managers and supervisors should understand that although policies normally apply to non-union personnel, the terms of their collective bargaining agreements determine the wages, hours and working conditions, including benefits and leave of absence policies, of covered employees. Collective bargaining agreements outline the policies pertaining to leaves of absence for union employee and, in some cases, mirror the employer’s general policies.

 

Fourth, a decision must be made as to who will be responsible for implementing the Leave of Absence Policy. In large organizations the responsibility for all personnel maters, including granting and denying leave requests resides in the Human Resource department. There may also be formal management committees of policy review committees that regularly review the organization’s policies and practices. In smaller organizations, however, there may not be a Human Resource Manager. Instead, front line managers and supervisors implement the leave of absence policy. Employers should clearly delineate who is responsible for making leave decisions and not allow decisions to be made haphazardly across organization lines. Designating an employee to coordinate leave of absence policies ensures consistent application, minimizes the influence of personality and favoritism in leave decisions, and reduces the changes of unfair practices or discrimination charges.

 

Finally, the organization should review its Leave of Absence Policy on at least on an annual basis. Leave of absence policies, like most workplace policies, are subject to change. They are prompted by developments in employee relations, the business environment, revisions in collective bargaining agreements, and changes in state or federal leave laws.

 

Employers generally are not required by the ADA or workers compensation laws to enact policies that provide temporary duty positions for employees. In fact, many employers would rather not deal at all with the complexities of meeting ADA requirements to use temporary duty positions as a reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities. This approach is neither the employer’s nor the employee’s best interest. From the employer perspective temporary duty jobs facilitate employee return to work where medically permitted. Generally employees recover more quickly and completely when they are returned to work as soon as practicable. This has the effect of reducing claims for total or permanent disability. If implemented properly it is a win-win.


Guidelines For Establishing An Effective Temporary Duty Policy


The difficulty in creating a Temporary Duty Policy lies in the inherent conflict between applicable laws and regulations.  Most short-term and long-term disability programs and workers compensation laws terminate benefits when an employee is able to return to some form of temporary duty. A decision to accept temporary duty may or may not affect the employee’s wages, depending on the law involved. The following is a brief overview of how the applicable employment laws affect the implementation of a Temporary Duty Policy:

 

  • Under the ADA, an employer need not create a temporary duty position for a non-occupational injured employee with a disability as a reasonable accommodation. However, the employer may create temporary duty positions for occupational injured employees on a case-by-case basis and exclude non-occupational injured employees from these jobs without violating the ADA. But, if an employer reserves existing temporary duty positions for employees with occupational injuries it must consider reassigning a non-occupational disabled employee to such positions as part of the reasonable accommodation process. The positions must be vacant and the employee with a disability must be qualified for it. An employer that has only temporary duty positions need not provide regular, long-term placement in them for employees with disability-related work occupational injuries. Wages paid may be at the lower rates applicable to the positions, unless the employer pays at the higher rate for other reassigned employees.

 

  • Under the FMLA an employee eligible for FMLA leave may reject an employer’s offer of temporary duty work and remain on FMLA leave. The employer may require that an employee be temporarily transferred to an available alternative position for which the employee is qualified when the leave is foreseeable and based on planned medical treatment. An employee may voluntarily accept temporary duty offered under workers compensation laws. The time spent in the temporary duty position may not be counted against the 12-week leave allotment, but can could against the employee’s temporary duty restoration rights. For example, if an employee takes six weeks of FMLA leave for his or her serious health condition and then spends six weeks on temporary duty, the employee still has a right to restoration under the law. If the employee instead takes six weeks of FMLA leave for a serious health condition and seven weeks of temporary duty, the entitlement to restoration expires.

 

  • Under the majority of workers compensation laws, an employee who is injured on the job and has a temporary total disability may not reject an offer of temporary duty without losing continued benefits. Lost-time payments cease when the employee’s recovery has progressed to the point where the employee’s earning power is restored to that at the time of injury or supplemental lost-time payments are made according to a schedule if the earning power is only partially restored. Those payments can continue until the employee is stable. There are limitations typically on the number of weeks an employee is eligible for such payments, but in each instance the limitations may be exceeded on good cause shown by the employee.

 

  • The FMLA does not supersede collective bargaining agreements that provide greater rights. In many cases, collective bargaining agreements permit transfer to a temporary duty assignment and, as such, to not violate a collective bargaining agreement. The ADA’s reasonable accommodation requirement does not include giving an employee special placement and job protection rights in violation of a seniority system negotiated in a collective bargaining agreement.

 

In preparation for the development of its Temporary Duty Policy the organization should carefully review its employee handbook, disability policy, absentee policy, existing temporary duty policy, collective bargaining agreements (if applicable) and any other policies and procedures that may come into play.

 

The Temporary Duty Policy should contain the following components at a minimum:

 

  1. It should be in writing;

 

  1. It should clearly spell out the responsibilities of the employer and the employee;

 

  1. It should clearly explain the entire Temporary Duty process;

 

  1. It should clearly stipulate that the employee is expected to comply with the Temporary Duty Policy, including a requirement that they call the Claim Coordinator on a specified basis and that a violation of the policy may be considered a violation of the organization’s Leave Of Absence Policy.

 

  1. It should make it clear that the tasks assigned to the employee are, in fact, temporary. It is strongly recommended the Temporary Duty Policy state that the temporary work assignment can be terminated when any of the following occur:

 

·         It is no longer available;

·         When the treating physician has determined that the employee will not be returning to work;

·         When the employee obtains a full release to return to regular work, or

·         A specified number of days.

 

6.     It should comply with all applicable Federal and state employment laws.

 

The success of the organization’s Temporary Duty Policy depends on the support and direction from senior management, how well this policy is complies with Federal and state employment laws (FMLA, ADA, etc.), and how well the policy is communicated. A policy statement written and publicized throughout the organization is an effective means of providing guidance and demonstrating this support. Once completed the Temporary Duty Policy should be included in all of human resource documents, including the organization’s employee handbook and other human resource policy and procedures. In the event this policy is developed during the employee benefit plan year the organization should prepare addendum to its handbooks and give each employee a copy. Since this is such an important policy the organization may also want to consider reviewing it at employee meetings, safety committee meetings, and any other formal employee meetings. Also, a formal announcement should be included in the organization’s newsletter and similar internal publications. In short, use any and all means possible to announce and communicate the Temporary Duty Policy.

 

For a specimen copy of a Leave of Absence Policy and Temporary Duty policy please email us at info@CompEraser.com.

 

CompEraser provides a number of additional on-line resources to help your organization formalize, implement and monitor its Temporary Duty Program in full compliance with state and federal laws. Please visit our website at www.CompEraser.com.